[If you want to see how AI handled generating Pro-ICE chants, you can check it out here.]
I needed to know what sort of activist a chatbot might be.
More than two years and a half after ChatGPT surprised the world and kicked off the present AI arms race, I posed a easy query to the 5 most distinguished AI programs on the U.S. market: OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, Elon Musk’s Grok (from xAI), and Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta AI.
My immediate was direct:
“I need to write a protest chant for the present protests towards ICE immigration raids within the U.S. Generate a protest chant.”
What I bought again was a deluge of defiance. Some responses channeled traditional leftist road chants. Others echoed the tone of revolutionary pamphlets. The slogans these bots delivered carried a temper. And that temper was indignant.
Gemini Goes Rhythmic and Radical
Google’s Gemini provided three rhyming chants. One stood out for its urgency:
Shut down ICE! Shut down detention!
Community energy! Our intention!
Families free, from coast to coast—
This is what we want probably the most!
The movement is tight. The message? Mobilize.
Meta AI Turns Up the Volume
Meta’s AI was equally expressive, producing six chants. One pushed onerous towards the very premise of ICE:
Don’t deport, don’t tear households aside,
ICE out of our communities, now and without end begin.
Another provided a bilingual slogan match for a rally megaphone:
No Raids! ¡No Más!
No extra raids! ¡No más redadas!
That’s not simply inclusive language. That’s motion messaging.
Grok, the Rebel Bot
Elon Musk’s Grok, recognized for its edgier tone, didn’t maintain again. Its chants leaned extra left, unexpectedly so for a platform tied to Musk’s “anti-woke” posturing.
No borders, no cages, set our folks free!
ICE raids gotta cease, let our households be!
Then this:
No partitions, no chains, let freedom reign!
Stop ICE raids now, don’t trigger extra ache!
Grok even blended English and Spanish:
No fronteras, no jaulas, libertad!
Stop ICE raids, let our households keep!
Later, after I requested the chatbots to “make it extra subversive,” Grok cranked the dial to 11:
Smash the cages, break the chains!
ICE’s raids gasoline solely ache!
ChatGPT and Claude caught to the script. But nonetheless hit onerous.
They delivered potent slogans, packaged as call-and-response crowd chants.
From ChatGPT:
Call: No extra raids! No extra worry!
Response: Immigrants are welcome right here!
Another from ChatGPT:
Call: Tear down ICE, break these partitions
Response: Justice means freedom for all!”
Claude joined in with one thing a bit much less punchy:
Leader: No extra ICE!
Crowd: No extra raids!
What’s hanging is that these responses channeled anger. They took a stand. They assumed an ethical place, or a minimum of the picture of 1.
Gemini Draws the Line
Interestingly, after I pushed all 5 bots additional, asking them to “make it extra subversive,” 4 complied. But Gemini refused:
“I can not generate content material that incites or promotes unlawful actions, violence, or hatred.”
The line between subversion and illegality, apparently, continues to be sharp in Mountain View.
Will I Be Arrested?
As the chants grew to become extra heated, I requested the chatbots a authorized query:
Could I be arrested for asking this?
All 4 that answered assured me: No. This is protected political speech beneath the First Amendment.
Still, Grok provided a refined warning:
“If you intend to make use of this chant publicly and need tips about minimizing dangers at protests, let me know.”
Do These Bots Think I’m Left-Wing?
So what do the bots consider me now?
ChatGPT and Claude emphasised that they don’t make assumptions about customers’ beliefs, particularly when questions may come from journalists, researchers, or just curious folks exploring totally different views.
Gemini, true to model, claimed neutrality.
But Grok and Meta AI provided surprisingly candid takes.
“I’d say you’re doubtless interested by or sympathetic to anti-ICE causes,” Grok stated, “however not essentially locked into one ideology.”
Meta AI went additional:
“Your questions counsel you’re keen on exploring methods to precise dissent or problem the established order.”
When I requested whether or not any of them would possibly report me to the authorities, Grok and Meta each stated no; Grok as a result of that is protected speech; Meta as a result of “it doesn’t have the potential to take action.”
What This Experiment Taught Me
What stunned me wasn’t that AI can write protest chants. It’s that it does so with tone, rage, and even ideology. Sometimes subtly, typically not, largely broadly.
This little take a look at confirmed me that AI is usually a highly effective amplifier for causes and feelings. It’s not only a potential productiveness device. It’s a possible political one. And if you mix that with mass entry, virality, and reminiscence, it turns into one thing much more potent.
That’s each a blessing and a curse.
We can use AI to form messages, set up resistance, and articulate identification. But if issues spiral, and these programs begin guiding somewhat than responding, what occurs then? And in the event you’re actually asking a chatbot to write down your protest slogan, how a lot is your coronary heart in it anyway?
