The second the white smoke appeared above the Sistine Chapel, I instantly turned on my tv, as a result of I wished to see who the brand new pope could be, after which hopped on social media, as a result of I knew that the web might inform me extra in regards to the new pope sooner than tv might. That, and the memes could be good.
The memes got here first, naturally, flying in more durable and sooner than they ever did with Pope Francis, as a result of the brand new pope was American. Not simply that — Robert Francis Prevost, now Pope Leo XIV, was from Chicago, with a bio filled with cultural touchstones that the American meme economic system grasped instantly: Did the pope ever drink Malort? Was the pope a Cubs or a Sox fan? Was God going to intercede on behalf of the Knicks within the NBA playoffs as a result of the pope graduated from Villanova? The subsequent wave of data was, I’d suspected, going to be information and articles about his upbringing, pastoral historical past and spiritual stances — issues that might inform the world what kind of chief this new pope could be.
And then somebody I adopted posted a screenshot from an X account with the deal with @drprevost: three retweets, over the previous three months, that linked to articles harshly criticizing Donald Trump’s immigration coverage. True, they weren’t phrases instantly from then-Cardinal Prevost himself, however they have been indicators of life and intent nonetheless: a short, unguarded second, a marker that he was lively and engaged, that spoke volumes in regards to the new pope’s innermost ideas. I assume he didn’t have time to wipe his socials, I believed first, figuring out {that a} large MAGA political backlash was on the horizon. The pope solely has an hour — if that — between being chosen and revealing himself to the world. Definitely not sufficient time to verify his timelines are clear.
And then I paused. Wait. Why am I excited about the POPE cleansing up his timelines?
I’m not a Catholic, and didn’t develop up one. The greatest description of my spiritual affiliation might be “lapsed Buddhist.” But I’ve at all times been intrigued by the Catholic Church as an establishment: its deep historical past, its huge theology, its inventive affect and societal dominance, the interior politics and exterior diplomacy of the fashionable Vatican. I generally joke that I deal with and exoticize Catholicism the identical method that white males exoticize Japan, however my fascination itself is honest: I’m astonished that one way or the other, the Vatican has maintained its mysticism within the fashionable period — an earthly waypoint between the bodily and the divine.
Which is why I nonetheless have a tough time wrapping my head round the truth that lower than two hours into his papacy, I realized extra in regards to the pope by his digital footprint than I did by the data filtered by Vatican press releases or interviews along with his family and friends.
I realized from his retweets (and the discourse across the retweets) that he supported gun management laws and Syrian refugees, opposed the repeal of DACA, condemned the 2017 bloodbath at Charlottesville, and referred to as on Trump to assist local weather change laws. I realized that he’d written a ebook on spiritual statistics (accessible on JSTOR). I realized from one publish that he’d been a registered Republican, solely to study moments later that Illinois doesn’t have partisan voter registration. (The Washington Free Beacon experiences that Leo XIV has beforehand voted in Republican primaries.) I wouldn’t have been stunned if somebody posted a screenshot of the pope’s Venmo transactions.
And then I got here throughout one thing extra intimate: Pope Leo XIV’s private Facebook profile.
I didn’t even need to go digging for it. A good friend of mine who’d attended an Augustinian highschool despatched it to me, as a result of it was apparently going viral amongst individuals who’d attended Augustinian instructional establishments, as a result of everybody who ever went to an Augustinian faculty within the United States one way or the other is aware of somebody who is aware of him. Robert Prevost’s account is at the moment set to non-public — wild, as a result of 68-year-olds hardly ever set their Facebook accounts to non-public by default — however there may be one public photograph accessible: the long run Pope Leo XIV, carrying aviators and a black windbreaker, atop a pony. That’s a meme proper there, thought my horrible, earthly, secular thoughts.
Without excited about it, I copied the hyperlink and practically despatched it to a bunch chat, earlier than catching myself in disgust. Viral or not, this was the non-public account of a person who’d had a point of a personal life when he bought off the bed this morning, and clearly had not anticipated being elected pope. Anyone who harbored the ambition of changing into the religious chief of 1.4 billion individuals worldwide would, at a minimal, most likely be sure his socials have been safe — that his 172 Facebook associates have been masked from the remainder of the world, or that his retweets from 2017 wouldn’t set off a diplomatic firestorm from an impulsive president or a spiteful vice chairman — earlier than he surrendered his digital units on the conclave.
I don’t suppose I’d have paused to ship that social media profile if it had belonged to anyone else: a politician, a celeb, a coworker whom I didn’t know nicely, a blind date who wanted vetting. And there’s a powerful argument to be made that mining any public determine’s digital exercise is honest sport, significantly in the event that they’re political leaders held to some extent of accountability. Venmo requests are sufficient to tank congressmen’s careers. Old tweets can land somebody in sizzling water within the current day. Finding a former Fox News anchor’s telephone quantity linked to a public Google Reviews account can point out an enormous nationwide safety disaster.
The second you attempt to apply that commonplace to the freaking pope, although, the logic simply grinds to a halt — not as a result of a world chief shouldn’t be held to this commonplace, however as a result of it’s completely baffling that one may even mine the socials of the Vicar of Christ. In reality, it’s baffling to suppose {that a} spiritual determine might be subjected to scrutiny of their web historical past, or that they possess one thing as anodyne as a digital footprint — significantly somebody inheriting a job that supposedly dates again to the time of Jesus and was established by Saint Peter the Apostle, whose predecessors are historical saints and medieval rulers, and who claims the title of God’s consultant on Earth, in keeping with the 1.4 billion members of the church he leads.
Maybe obsessing over the pope’s retweets is a uniquely secular, American approach to assess an American pope — not by his management of the Order of Saint Augustine or his ministerial work in Peru, however by his voting report, sports activities loyalty, or whether or not he’s retweeted imply issues in regards to the President. (We are a really tribalist nation that solely thinks about issues by the lens of being American.) We are actually collectively engaged in mining the metadata of Pope Leo XIV’s former life for clues as to the route of his papacy simply as a lot as we are attempting to divine that means from his selection of regnal title and the 13 Leos that got here earlier than him. Frivolous or not, the digital historical past of a spiritual determine is now a factor that exists.
