Individuals, trade teams, and native governments submitted over 10,000 feedback to the White House about its work-in-progress nationwide AI coverage, also referred to as the AI Action Plan. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) on Thursday revealed the textual content of the submissions in a PDF spanning 18,480 pages.
The feedback, which contact on subjects starting from copyright to the environmental harms of AI information facilities, come as President Donald Trump and allies rejigger the U.S. authorities’s AI priorities.
In January, President Trump repealed former President Joe Biden’s AI Executive Order, which had instructed the National Institute of Standards and Technology to creator steering that helps firms determine — and proper for — flaws in fashions, together with biases. Critics allied with Trump argued that the order’s reporting necessities have been onerous and successfully compelled firms to reveal their commerce secrets and techniques.
Shortly after revoking the AI Executive Order, Trump signed an order directing federal companies to advertise the event of AI “free from ideological bias” that promotes “human flourishing, financial competitiveness, and nationwide safety.” Importantly, Trump’s order made no point out of combating AI discrimination, which was a key tenet of Biden’s initiative.
Comments submitted to the White House clarify what’s at stake within the AI race.
A lot of commenters asserted that AI is exploitative, in a phrase, educated on the works of creatives who aren’t compensated for his or her involuntary contributions, and petitioned the Trump administration to strengthen copyright regulation. On the opposing facet, commenters resembling VC agency Andreessen Horowitz accused rightsholders of placing up roadblocks to AI improvement.
Several AI firms, together with Google and OpenAI, have additionally pushed for friendlier guidelines round AI coaching in earlier feedback on the AI Action Plan.
Petitions from organizations together with Americans for Prosperity, The Future of Life Institute, and the American Academy of Nursing emphasised the significance of investments in analysis at a time when the federal authorities is slashing scientific grants. AI specialists have criticized the Trump administration’s latest cuts to scientific grant-making, and, particularly, reductions championed by billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.
Some commenters on the AI Action Plan took goal on the Trump administration’s far-ranging tariffs on overseas items, suggesting that they might hurt home AI efforts. The Data Center Coalition, a commerce affiliation representing the information heart sector, says tariffs on infrastructure parts “will restrict and sluggish” U.S. AI investments. Elsewhere, the Information Technology Industry Council, an advocacy group whose members embody Amazon, Intel, and Microsoft, urged “good” tariffs that “defend home industries with out escalating commerce wars that hurt shoppers.”
Only a handful of feedback talked about “AI censorship,” a subject high of thoughts for a lot of of Trump’s shut confidants. Elon Musk and crypto and AI “czar” David Sacks have alleged that widespread chatbots censor conservative viewpoints, with Sacks singling out ChatGPT particularly as untruthful about politically delicate topics.
In reality, bias in AI is an intractable technical downside. Musk’s AI firm, xAI, has itself struggled to create a chatbot that doesn’t endorse some political beliefs over others.
President Trump has ramped up efforts to assemble an AI coverage crew in latest months.
In March, the Senate confirmed Trump’s choose for director of the OSTP, Michael Kratsios, who targeted on AI coverage within the OSTP throughout Trump’s first time period. Toward the tip of final 12 months, Trump named former VC Sriram Krishnan because the White House’s senior coverage advisor for AI.
