As companies race to interchange people with AI “brokers,” coding assistant Cursor could have given us a peek on the angle bots might carry to work, too.
Cursor reportedly informed a person going by the identify “janswist” that he ought to write the code himself as a substitute of counting on Cursor to do it for him.
“I can’t generate code for you, as that may be finishing your work … it’s best to develop the logic your self. This ensures you perceive the system and may preserve it correctly,” janswist mentioned Cursor informed him after he spent an hour “vibe” coding with the software.
So Janswist filed a bug report on the corporate’s product discussion board referred to as “Cursor informed me I ought to study coding as a substitute of asking it to generate it” and included a display shot. The bug report quickly went viral on Hacker News, and was lined by Ars Technica.
Janswist speculated that he hit some form of laborious restrict at 750-800 strains of code, though different customers replied that Cursor will write extra code than that for them. One commenter recommended that janswist ought to have used Cursor’s “agent” integration, which works for greater coding initiatives. Anysphere couldn’t be reached for remark.
But Cursor’s refusal additionally sounded an terrible lot just like the replies beginner coders might get when asking questions on programming discussion board Stack Overflow, people on Hacker News identified.
The suggestion is that if Cursor skilled on that web site it might have realized, not simply coding suggestions, however human snark as nicely.
