The part particularly responding to the rumors reads:
Apple has by no means used Siri information to construct advertising profiles, by no means made it out there for promoting, and by no means offered it to anybody for any function. We are continuously creating applied sciences to make Siri much more non-public, and can proceed to take action.
After The Guardian’s report in 2019, Apple apologized and altered its coverage, making the default setting to not retain audio recordings from Siri interactions and saying that for customers who opt-in to sharing recordings, these recordings wouldn’t be shared with third-party contractors.
However, experiences concerning the settlement famous that in earlier filings like this one from 2021, among the plaintiffs claimed that after they talked about model names like “Olive Garden,” “Easton bats,” “Pit Viper sun shades,” and “Air Jordans,” they have been served adverts for corresponding merchandise, which they attributed to Siri information.
Apple’s assertion tonight says it “doesn’t retain audio recordings of Siri interactions until customers explicitly choose in to assist enhance Siri, and even then, the recordings are used solely for that function. Users can simply opt-out at any time.”
Facebook responded to related theories in 2014 and 2016 earlier than Mark Zuckerberg addressed it instantly, saying “no” to the query whereas being grilled by Congress over the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018.
So, if Apple (and Facebook, Google, and many others.) is telling the reality, then why would you see an advert later for one thing you solely talked about?
There are different explanations, and makes an attempt to examine the rumors out embrace an investigation in 2018 that didn’t discover proof of microphone spying however did uncover that some apps secretly recorded on-screen consumer exercise that they shipped to 3rd events.
